Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Blazing Wilds Megaways™

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cascading reels
RTP
94.96%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Plushie Frenzy

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
94.82%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Reactoonz 100

Play’n GO

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
7
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Blazing Wilds Megaways™ vs Plushie Frenzy

  • Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Plushie Frenzy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 94.96% against 94.82% — Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Plushie Frenzy does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Blazing Wilds Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Plushie Frenzy reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Blazing Wilds Megaways™ vs Reactoonz 100

  • Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Reactoonz 100 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 94.96% against 96.20% — Reactoonz 100 is 1.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)