Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 94.96% against 95.07% — Gravity Bonanza is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Different format families: Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Plushie Frenzy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 94.96% against 94.82% — Blazing Wilds Megaways™ is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Plushie Frenzy does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Blazing Wilds Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Plushie Frenzy reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)