Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Book of Monsters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Hop & Drop
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.46%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Book of Monsters returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Hop & Drop reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
