Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Book of Tut Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Nine To Five
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 9,217×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.00% against 96.03%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 9,217×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Nine To Five does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Nine To Five returns more in theory over the long run, while Book of Tut Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
