Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Bow of Artemis
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Win-A-Beest
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.12%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,240×
- Reels
- 240
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Bow of Artemis is Cascading reels, Win-A-Beest is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.12% — Win-A-Beest is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,240×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
