Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Buffalo King Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Lion Saga Odyssey
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Buffalo King Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Lion Saga Odyssey is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.58% — Lion Saga Odyssey is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
