Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Candy Jar Clusters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
DJ Psycho
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,420×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Chocolate Deluxe
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Candy Jar Clusters vs DJ Psycho
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.05%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 25,420×, with DJ Psycho higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: DJ Psycho does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Candy Jar Clusters returns more in theory over the long run, while DJ Psycho reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Candy Jar Clusters vs Chocolate Deluxe
- Different format families: Candy Jar Clusters is Cluster pays, Chocolate Deluxe is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.75% — Chocolate Deluxe is 0.67 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Candy Jar Clusters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Chocolate Deluxe does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Chocolate Deluxe returns more in theory over the long run, while Candy Jar Clusters reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
