Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Candy Jar Clusters
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Sugar Supreme Powernudge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.09%.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Candy Jar Clusters higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sugar Supreme Powernudge returns more in theory over the long run, while Candy Jar Clusters reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
