Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Candy Rush is Cascading reels, Sweet Alchemy is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.52% — Candy Rush is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 15,000× against 3,000×, with Candy Rush higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Different format families: Candy Rush is Cascading reels, Candy Burst is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.95% — Candy Burst is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Burst does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Add to the comparison (up to four)