Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Candy Rush
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Candy Blitz Bombs
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Candy Burst
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.95%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Candy Rush vs Candy Blitz Bombs
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.49% — Candy Rush is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.0×: 15,000× against 5,000×, with Candy Rush higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Candy Rush vs Candy Burst
- Different format families: Candy Rush is Cascading reels, Candy Burst is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.95% — Candy Burst is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Candy Burst does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
