Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Candy Stars
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets, Sci-fi & neon
VS
Sugar Rush Xmas
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Starstruck
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.19%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,635×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Candy Stars vs Sugar Rush Xmas
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Sweets.
Candy Stars vs Starstruck
- Different format families: Candy Stars is Cascading reels, Starstruck is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.19% — Candy Stars is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 3.1×: 5,000× against 1,635×, with Candy Stars higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Starstruck does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
