Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Candy Village

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
Not published
Volatility
High
Win cap
21,175×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sweets
Free demo available →
VS

Sugar Teddy x1000

Booongo

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Sweets
Free demo available →
VS

Dr. Toonz

Play’n GO

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.25%
Volatility
High
Win cap
22,000×
Reels
0
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Candy Village vs Sugar Teddy x1000

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Candy Village does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Sugar Teddy x1000 does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Sweets.

Candy Village vs Dr. Toonz

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Candy Village does not publish one.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 21,175× and 22,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: High.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)