Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cash Box
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.02%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Midas Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.73%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Standard video slot. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.02% against 96.73% — Midas Fortune is 0.71 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Midas Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
