Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Castle of Fire
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 95.03%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

BRICK SNAKE 2000
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.03%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 8,110×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

3x Catch
Booongo
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Castle of Fire vs BRICK SNAKE 2000
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.03% against 96.03% — BRICK SNAKE 2000 is 1.00 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 8,000× and 8,110×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: BRICK SNAKE 2000 does not publish a rating.
Castle of Fire vs 3x Catch
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


