Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Cheetah Wild

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.50%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
5,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals, Wealth
Free demo available →
VS

Arctic Wolf Triple Riches

Microgaming

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
96.18%
Volatility
High
Win cap
Not published
Reels
5
Theme signals
Animals, Wealth
VS

3x Catch

Booongo

Format family
Ways to win
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
Not published
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Animals, Wealth
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Cheetah Wild vs Arctic Wolf Triple Riches

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.18% — Cheetah Wild is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Volatility labels differ: Low against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
  • Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.

Cheetah Wild vs 3x Catch

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish one.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: 3x Catch does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Animals, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)