Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Chicken Chase - Caccia alla Gallina
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 210×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Monkey Madness
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 200×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.48% against 96.53%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 210× and 200×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Monkey Madness returns more in theory over the long run, while Chicken Chase - Caccia alla Gallina reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
