Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Christmas Carol Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.21%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Christmas Carol Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Monkey: Battle for the Scrolls is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.21% — Christmas Carol Megaways™ is 0.37 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Christmas Carol Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
