Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Code of Cairo

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cascading reels
RTP
96.51%
Volatility
Low
Win cap
1,500×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Egypt
Free demo available →
VS

Pharaoh Royals

PG Soft

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.76%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,000×
Reels
3
Theme signals
Egypt
Free demo available →
VS

Owls

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.22%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
1,374×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Code of Cairo vs Pharaoh Royals

  • Different format families: Code of Cairo is Cascading reels, Pharaoh Royals is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.76% — Pharaoh Royals is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 1,500× against 2,000×, with Pharaoh Royals higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Pharaoh Royals does not publish a rating.
  • Shared theme signals: Egypt.

Code of Cairo vs Owls

  • Different format families: Code of Cairo is Cascading reels, Owls is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.22% — Code of Cairo is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,500× and 1,374×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Owls does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)