Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Code of Cairo
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Legacy of Egypt
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Code of Cairo is Cascading reels, Legacy of Egypt is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 3.3×: 1,500× against 5,000×, with Legacy of Egypt higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Code of Cairo returns more in theory over the long run, while Legacy of Egypt reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
