Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Code of Cairo
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Fury of Anubis
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Owls
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,374×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Code of Cairo vs Fury of Anubis
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.52%.
- Win caps differ by about 6.7×: 1,500× against 10,000×, with Fury of Anubis higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Egypt.
Code of Cairo vs Owls
- Different format families: Code of Cairo is Cascading reels, Owls is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.22% — Code of Cairo is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,500× and 1,374×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Owls does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
