Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Cosmic Clusters! is Cascading reels, Star Joker is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.45% against 96.25% — Cosmic Clusters! is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against Low. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cosmic Clusters! returns more in theory over the long run, while Star Joker reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.45% against 96.50%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Add to the comparison (up to four)