Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Coven Rising
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.42%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cash Vandal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Coins of Fortune
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 6,015×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Coven Rising vs Cash Vandal
- Different format families: Coven Rising is Cascading reels, Cash Vandal is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.42% against 96.47%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Coven Rising vs Coins of Fortune
- Different format families: Coven Rising is Cascading reels, Coins of Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.42% against 96.48% — Coins of Fortune is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 6,015×, with Coins of Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
