Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Coven Rising
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.42%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cosmic Clusters!
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.45%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Cash Vandal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Coven Rising vs Cosmic Clusters!
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.42% against 96.45%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Coven Rising vs Cash Vandal
- Different format families: Coven Rising is Cascading reels, Cash Vandal is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.42% against 96.47%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
