Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cowboy Coins
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth, Wild west
VS
Gold Oasis
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,260×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Crabby's Gold II
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 30,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cowboy Coins vs Gold Oasis
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.06%.
- Win caps differ by about 4.1×: 30,000× against 7,260×, with Cowboy Coins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Cowboy Coins vs Crabby's Gold II
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.22% — Crabby's Gold II is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 30,000× and 30,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
