Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Crown of Fire
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rotiki
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Voodoo Magic
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Crown of Fire vs Rotiki
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.20% — Crown of Fire is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Crown of Fire returns more in theory over the long run, while Rotiki reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Crown of Fire vs Voodoo Magic
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.50% — Voodoo Magic is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
