Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Curse of the Werewolf Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 40,976×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Christmas Carol Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.58% — Christmas Carol Megaways™ is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 40,976× against 20,000×, with Curse of the Werewolf Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Christmas Carol Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Curse of the Werewolf Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
