Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Cyberheist City is Cascading reels, Inferno Star is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.38% — Cyberheist City is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,500×, with Cyberheist City higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.

Different format families: Cyberheist City is Cascading reels, Great Game Rockies is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.33% — Cyberheist City is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cyberheist City returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Game Rockies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)