Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Cyberheist City
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Inferno Star
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.38%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
VS
Alien Invaders
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Cyberheist City vs Inferno Star
- Different format families: Cyberheist City is Cascading reels, Inferno Star is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.38% — Cyberheist City is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,500×, with Cyberheist City higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Cyberheist City vs Alien Invaders
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Sci-fi & neon.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
