Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Diamond Cascade
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 8,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
Fruity Treats
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fruit & classic
VS
Diamonds Power XXL: Hold and Win
Booongo
- Format family
- Hold & Win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Diamond Cascade vs Fruity Treats
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.06% against 96.05%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.6×: 8,000× against 5,000×, with Diamond Cascade higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Diamond Cascade vs Diamonds Power XXL: Hold and Win
- Different format families: Diamond Cascade is Cascading reels, Diamonds Power XXL: Hold and Win is Hold & Win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Booongo — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Diamonds Power XXL: Hold and Win does not publish one.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Diamonds Power XXL: Hold and Win does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
