Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.75% — Leprechaun goes Egypt is 0.25 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 700× against 500×, with Egyptian Fortunes higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Leprechaun goes Egypt returns more in theory over the long run, while Egyptian Fortunes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Egypt.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.48%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 700× and 700×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Egyptian Fortunes returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Pixies reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)