Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Extra Juicy
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 60,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Honey Rush 100
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 7
- Theme signals
- Sweets
VS
Pirate Gold
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 32,270×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Extra Juicy vs Honey Rush 100
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.20% — Extra Juicy is 0.32 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 60,000× against 50,000×, with Extra Juicy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Extra Juicy vs Pirate Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.9×: 60,000× against 32,270×, with Extra Juicy higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
