Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fat Panda
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
10000 Fortunes
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Tribe
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 27,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fat Panda vs 10000 Fortunes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: 10000 Fortunes does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Fat Panda vs Dragon Tribe
- Different format families: Fat Panda is Fixed paylines, Dragon Tribe is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.07%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 20,000× against 27,000×, with Dragon Tribe higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Tribe does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
