Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.01% — Fat Panda is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 40,160×, with Dragon Ship higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fat Panda returns more in theory over the long run, while Dragon Ship reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Different format families: Fat Panda is Fixed paylines, Dragon Tribe is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.07% against 96.07%.
Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 20,000× against 27,000×, with Dragon Tribe higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Dragon Tribe does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)