Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fat Panda
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.07%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon's Gate - Bonus Choice
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.07% against 96.50% — Dragon's Gate - Bonus Choice is 0.43 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 20,000× against 10,000×, with Fat Panda higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Dragon's Gate - Bonus Choice returns more in theory over the long run, while Fat Panda reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
