Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fire Archer
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.12%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Floating Dragon
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.67%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fire Archer vs Floating Dragon
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.12% against 95.67% — Floating Dragon is 0.55 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Floating Dragon higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Fire Archer vs Great Game Rockies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.12% against 96.33% — Great Game Rockies is 1.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Great Game Rockies higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Great Game Rockies does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
