Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Hacksaw Gaming

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.34% — Le Hooligan is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.46% — Wild Hop & Drop is 0.40 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 5,000×, with Fire Portals higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Wild Hop & Drop returns more in theory over the long run, while Fire Portals reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)