Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Floating Dragon
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 95.67%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Hero
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.00%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon’s Loot Link&Win 4Tune™
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.24%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Floating Dragon vs Dragon Hero
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 95.67% against 96.00% — Dragon Hero is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Floating Dragon vs Dragon’s Loot Link&Win 4Tune™
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.67% against 96.24% — Dragon’s Loot Link&Win 4Tune™ is 0.57 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
