Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Floating Dragon Megaways™ Hold & Spin
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Lucky Clover Riches
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.77%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Floating Dragon Megaways™ Hold & Spin is Cascading reels, Lucky Clover Riches is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.70% against 96.77% — Lucky Clover Riches is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.7×: 20,000× against 7,500×, with Floating Dragon Megaways™ Hold & Spin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Clover Riches does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lucky Clover Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Floating Dragon Megaways™ Hold & Spin reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
