Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Forge of Olympus is Cascading reels, Safari Wilds is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.25% against 96.75% — Safari Wilds is 0.50 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Safari Wilds does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Different format families: Forge of Olympus is Cascading reels, Bullion Xpress is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.25% against 96.29%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 5,000× against 6,000×, with Bullion Xpress higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)