Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fortunes of Aztec
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.42%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fortune Horse
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Jade Legends
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fortunes of Aztec vs Fortune Horse
- Different format families: Fortunes of Aztec is Cascading reels, Fortune Horse is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.42% against 96.76% — Fortune Horse is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Horse does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Fortunes of Aztec vs Jade Legends
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.42% against 96.50% — Jade Legends is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 20,000×, with Jade Legends higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
