Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Freya 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Cash Patrol
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Freya 1000 vs Cash Patrol
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Freya 1000 vs Sand and Ashes
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.27% — Freya 1000 is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Sand and Ashes does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Freya 1000 returns more in theory over the long run, while Sand and Ashes reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
