Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Frogs & Bugs
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
5 Lions
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,520×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Frogs & Bugs vs 5 Lions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Frogs & Bugs does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 3,520×, with 5 Lions higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Frogs & Bugs vs Outsourced
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Frogs & Bugs does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 3,000× against 5,000×, with Outsourced higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
