Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Frozen Tropics
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 95.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Hood vs Wolf
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 95.39%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Frozen Tropics is Cascading reels, Hood vs Wolf is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 95.09% against 95.39% — Hood vs Wolf is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.3×: 9,000× against 4,000×, with Frozen Tropics higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Hood vs Wolf does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Hood vs Wolf returns more in theory over the long run, while Frozen Tropics reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
