Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Fruit Party
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Music & party
VS

Fruit Party 2
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Music & party
VS

Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,910×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fruit Party vs Fruit Party 2
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.53% — Fruit Party 2 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic, Music & party.
Fruit Party vs Fruits
- Different format families: Fruit Party is Cascading reels, Fruits is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.23% — Fruit Party is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.7×: 5,000× against 2,910×, with Fruit Party higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fruits does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Add to the comparison (up to four)


