Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.53% — Fruit Party 2 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic, Music & party.

Different format families: Fruit Party is Cascading reels, Multifruit 81 is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.47% against 96.55% — Multifruit 81 is 0.08 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,520×, with Fruit Party higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Multifruit 81 returns more in theory over the long run, while Fruit Party reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Add to the comparison (up to four)