Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Pragmatic Play

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Fruit Party 2 is Cascading reels, Multifruit 81 is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.55%.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 2,520×, with Fruit Party 2 higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Multifruit 81 returns more in theory over the long run, while Fruit Party 2 reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.47% — Fruit Party 2 is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fruit Party 2 returns more in theory over the long run, while Fruit Party reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic, Music & party.

Add to the comparison (up to four)