Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Fruity Treats
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Fruit & classic
VS
Immortal Fruits
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,787×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic
VS
K-POP Hunter Zeus
Microgaming
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 95.91%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 50,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Fruity Treats vs Immortal Fruits
- Different format families: Fruity Treats is Cascading reels, Immortal Fruits is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.06%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 5,000× against 2,787×, with Fruity Treats higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Immortal Fruits returns more in theory over the long run, while Fruity Treats reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.
Fruity Treats vs K-POP Hunter Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.05% against 95.91% — Fruity Treats is 0.14 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 10.0×: 5,000× against 50,000×, with K-POP Hunter Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: High against Very high. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fruity Treats returns more in theory over the long run, while K-POP Hunter Zeus reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
