Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Nolimit City

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Fruity Treats is Cascading reels, Immortal Fruits is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.05% against 96.06%.
Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 5,000× against 2,787×, with Fruity Treats higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Immortal Fruits does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Immortal Fruits returns more in theory over the long run, while Fruity Treats reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Fruit & classic.

Different format families: Fruity Treats is Cascading reels, Fortune Rabbit is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.05% against 96.75% — Fortune Rabbit is 0.70 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Rabbit does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: East Asia.

Add to the comparison (up to four)