Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Fury of Anubis is Cascading reels, Anubis Wrath is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.75% — Anubis Wrath is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Anubis Wrath does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Egypt.

Different format families: Fury of Anubis is Cascading reels, Le Hooligan is Cluster pays. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.52% against 96.34% — Fury of Anubis is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Fury of Anubis returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Hooligan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)