Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Fury of Odin Megaways™

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cascading reels
RTP
95.97%
Volatility
High
Win cap
15,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Norse myth
Free demo available →
VS

Thor Hammer Time

Nolimit City

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.03%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
2,328×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Norse myth
Free demo available →
VS

Nitro Nights

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Fixed paylines
RTP
96.31%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
15,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Fury of Odin Megaways™ vs Thor Hammer Time

  • Different format families: Fury of Odin Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Thor Hammer Time is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.97% against 96.03% — Thor Hammer Time is 0.06 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Win caps differ by about 6.4×: 15,000× against 2,328×, with Fury of Odin Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Thor Hammer Time does not publish a rating.
  • Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Thor Hammer Time returns more in theory over the long run, while Fury of Odin Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
  • Shared theme signals: Norse myth.

Fury of Odin Megaways™ vs Nitro Nights

  • Different format families: Fury of Odin Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Nitro Nights is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • Published RTP: 95.97% against 96.31% — Nitro Nights is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 15,000× and 15,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Nitro Nights does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)